Mark’s lecture was on the topic of photography. He started off the lecture introducing a new word to us.
Punctum – The thing about a photograph that agitates / disturbs you.

What was interesting about the lecture was that i learnt that early days tripods were actually used to clamp people’s head in position to prevent them from moving while their photo was being taken.
During those days, to get a shot of yourself, people had to stay still for at least half an hour in order for the photo chemicals to react to light and prevent a blurry photo. (I can’t imagine if we had to do that now).
—
He then followed up and showed us a photo of a little child with a scratched out image of what seemed like another person. Most of us guessed that it was because the child was the “star” of the photo, so the other person was redundant. Shockingly, this kind of photo is known as Post Mortem Victorian Photography, where the child in the photo is actually dead. (WHAT? THAT’S BIZARRE AND KINDA MORBID). The purpose was for these kind of photos was to serve as a memento of a deceased loved one. If the body wasn’t able to stay upright for the photo, the mother would cover herself with a veil, and hold up her dead child from the back.
We went on doing a class experiment where we had to stay still for one minute and allow a classmate to take a photo of us. Honestly, that one minute felt like forever. How did people in the past manage to sit there for an hour just to get their portraits taken?
Selfie – A selfie is a self-portrait photograph, typically taken with a hand-held digital camera or camera phone. How does this differ from a self portrait?
We then looked at a series of photographs titled “Heads” by a photographer who took shots of his subjects when they were unaware, unposed. I thought that it was really interesting how the photos turned out and i feel that even though unposed, people often present themselves as cliches of what they should be. So through random photos taken of them, you could somewhat tell how they carry themselves out as a person.
—

Responding to a photograph we’ve taken during class, here’s mine:
It was a regular morning in Milan and i was wondering about the grounds of the cathedral. There was a homeless man going around asking people for spare change and i remember that people were avoiding, shunning him. I stood there and watched as people come and go. At one moment, sunlight came through the clouds and casted some light on the man. At that point, he seemed and looked lonelier than ever, it’s as though the light was emphasizing his moment of helplessness. It then made me wonder that these people you don’t pay much attention to, do they have another story to tell? If so, would you change your mind about them if you knew their story.
To summarize the photo in a single sentence:
Seeing in a different light.
—
Photography is an art form. I guess when we say that photography is art, it also refers to the process of which a photo is being taken, with art direction, lighting, posture, editing etc. One of the thoughts that Mark mentioned, “are we who we are in photos?” Photography plays a very big part in the society we now live in, be it food, portrait or landscape photography. With the desire to be constantly active on social media where earning likes and reposts from peers is a form of recognition and an indication of popularity, people have been getting obsessed with the need of getting the perfect “selfie”. Through this, we find that even though tens or hundreds of photos have been taken of the subject, it would eventually all be deleted, leaving just the one we think is perfect or good enough behind. Does this then dilute the whole meaning of photography as an art form? From the way i see it, the process of taking the photo is where the art is, the shifting of items so that the light hits the object right or the speck of dust in the corner of the photo that we only realise in post production. So by eliminating the “trial” photos and just leaving one behind, it already takes away the meaning of photography as an art. Adding on, i also think that a photo goes as far only to depict that particular moment. I feel that we are still ourselves in photos, but only to the extend of realistic likeness. A photograph isn’t able to capture thoughts, it’s like a time-stopper that reflects only emotions by the subject reflected at the click of the shutter.